В старых версиях браузеров сайт может отображаться некорректно. Для оптимальной работы с сайтом рекомендуем воспользоваться современным браузером.
We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
CInSt Research Seminar “Civic Culture vs. Apolitical Social Capital: The Case of Moscow Apartment Buildings”
Event ended
Alexander Rubin will present joint research with Leonid Polishchuk and Igor Shagalov “Civic Culture vs. Apolitical Social Capital: The Case of Moscow Apartment Buildings”.
Alexander Rubin, PhD student, Lecturer, Faculty of Economic Sciences HSE University Leonid Polishchuk, Professor, Leading Research Fellow, Center for Institutional Studies HSE University Igor Shagalov, Junior Research Fellow, Center for Institutional Studies HSE University
Abstract We study the interplay between two cultural traits, one of which is apolitical social capital, which powers up grassroots collective action, and the other – civic culture, which reflects responsibility for social welfare and prompts political participation. We contrast two types of collective action in the contemporary urban setting, one of which is civic and the other is not. In the first one, tenants of an apartment building collectively manage funds designated for the building upkeep, and thereby exercise their civic rights and duties within the “micro-jurisdiction” of building residents. In the second, tenants build fences and gates around their building turning it into a “gated community”, and thereby opting for a collective “exit” as a response to a lack of public safety and security and other governance failures in the surrounding municipality. Such reaction is patently uncivic, as it dumps significant external costs onto the rest of the city, including fragmentation and loss of public space, restriction of mobility, segregation, crime displacement, and civic disengagement and apathy over city-wide public matters. We use a unique database of nearly 30,000 Moscow apartment buildings to show that generic apolitical social capital in the tenant community in the absence of civic culture facilitates both types of collective action, the civic and the uncivic ones alike. However, civic culture plays different roles, augmenting generic social capital in the first type and impeding it in the second. Put differently, apolitical social capital and civic culture are cultural traits that reinforce (complement) each other in the case of a civic collective action, and counteract each other, when a contemplated collective action is uncivic.
March 28, 2019, 6:00-7:30 pm. Room 445, 20 Myasnitskaya street, Moscow. Working language: English.
All are welcome. If you don't have an HSE ID, please send your name and surname to savdeev@hse.ru before 1:00 PM on March 28.